Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation in outpatients with breast cancer in a teaching hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30968/rbfhss.2023.143.0966Abstract
Objective: to define the pharmacotherapeutic profile, drug relaxants and pharmaceutical interventions, adverse reactions in patients with breast cancer using patented intravenous chemotherapy at the pharmaceutical drug conciliation service. Methods: characterized as a cross-sectional observational one. Data were collected from medication reconciliation forms and data from spreadsheets of the clinical pharmacy service. Results: 31 pharmaceutical drug reconciliations were conducted from September to October 2022, out of a total of 70 patients with breast cancer undergoing intravenous chemotherapy. Most patients, 97% (n=30) were women, with a mean age of 52.51 years. As for education, only 32.3% (n=10) had completed high school. The AC-T protocol (Doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel) was the most used (38.7% n=12). Most patients 67.7% (n=21) had other comorbidities, with arterial hypertension being the most common. The average number of medications in continuous use per patient was 3.38, with 45.2% (n=14) using 4 or more medications, which characterizes polypharmacy, in addition to the use of medicinal teas, which was identified in 50% (n =12) of patients. Discrepancies were found in these medication reconciliations in 83.9% (n=26) of the patients. In addition, 91 drug relaxants were observed, with an average of 2.9 relaxants per patient. Regarding pharmaceutical interventions, 24 possible interventions were identified, with an average of 0.77 interventions per patient. Most patients (61.3% n=19) had some adverse reaction since the last chemotherapy session. Conclusion: the results reinforce the importance of the pharmaceutical professional and medication reconciliation in outpatients, ensuring the safety and effectiveness of treatments.
Downloads
References
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;68(6):394–424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492.
Santos MO. Estimativa/2020 – Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. 2020;66(1):e-00927. DOI: 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2020v66n1.927.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. A situação do câncer de mama no Brasil: síntese de dados dos sistemas de informação. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2019.
Behranvand N, Nasri F, Zolfaghari Emameh R, et al. Correction to: Chemotherapy: a double‑edged sword in cancer treatment. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy. 2021;71(3):527–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03034-y.
Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast cancer treatment: a review. JAMA. 2019;321(3):288. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.19323.
Darcis E, Germeys J, Stragier M, et al. The impact of medication reconciliation and review in patients using oral chemotherapy. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. 2022;29(2):270- 275. DOI: 10.1177/10781552211066959.
Santos FND. Avaliação do cuidado farmacêutico na conciliação de medicamentos em pacientes idosos com câncer [Tese de Doutorado]. Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 2018. DOI: 10.11606/T.17.2018.tde-23072018-135825.
Boşnak AS, Birand N, Diker Ö, et al. The role of the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary approach to the prevention and resolution of drug-related problems in cancer chemotherapy. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. 2018;25(6):1312–20. DOI: 10.1177/1078155218786048.
Chun DS, Faso A, Muss HB, et al. Oncology pharmacist-led medication reconciliation among cancer patients initiating chemotherapy. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. 2019;26(5):1156–63. DOI: 10.1177/1078155219892066.
Mulligan E, Tuff LCR, Leclair J, et al. Implementation of a closed-loop medication reconciliation process for ambulatory oncology patients at Winchester District Memorial Hospital. Healthcare Management Forum. 2019;33(2):85–9. DOI: 10.1177/0840470419889650.
Wang W, Xiao B, Liu Z, et al. The Prevalence of the Potential Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Anticancer Drugs in China: A Retrospective Study. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2019;48(3):435–43.
Fowler H, Belot A, Ellis L, et al. Comorbidity prevalence among cancer patients: a population-based cohort study of four cancers. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6472-9.
Wei C, Wu M, Tung H. Relationships between health literacy and quality of life among survivors with breast cancer. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2021;27(2): e12922. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12922.
Herledan C, Cerfon MA, Baudouin A, et al. Imact of pharmaceutical care interventions on multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2023; 14(4):101450. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101450.
Rodrigues J, Marques P, Gomes C, et al. Mitigating the Risk of Drug Interactions in Cancer Patients Taking Oral Anticancer Agents: The Role of a Multidisciplinary Team-Based Medication Reconciliation. Cureus. 2023;15(2): e35324. DOI:10.7759/cureus.35324.
Lobo RED, Bahia BPG, Silva GEA, et al. Interação medicamentosa em pacientes com câncer: revisão integrativa da literatura. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2021;7(3):32289–303. DOI: 10.34117/bjdv7n3-784.
Bibi R, Azhar S, Iqbal A, et al. Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in breast cancer patients and determination of their risk factors. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. 2021;27 (7):1616-1622. DOI: 10.1177/1078155220963212.
Hou YN, Deng G, Mao JJ. Practical Application of “About Herbs” Website. The Cancer Journal. 2019;25(5):357–66. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000403.
Fukumasu H, Latorre AO, Bracci N, et al. Fitoterápicos e potenciais interações medicamentosas na terapia do câncer. Revista Brasileira de Toxicologia. 2008;21(2):49-59.
Pezzani R, Salehi B, Vitalini S, et al. Synergistic Effects of Plant Derivatives and Conventional Chemotherapeutic Agents: An Update on the Cancer Perspective. Medicina. 2019;55(4):110. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55040110.
Barbosa MVC, dos Santos ANA, Torres SB et al. Ações de assistência farmacêutica para pacientes com câncer de mama: uma revisão integrativa. Research, Society and Development. 2022;11(6):e51011629425. DOI: 10.34119/bjhrv6n1-236.
Miranda A, Ortega D, Caiza P, Pilco G. Pharmaceutical intervention in the pharmacological therapy of elderly patients in San Luis-ECUADOR. Pharmacy Practice. 2023;21(1), 1-5. DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2023.1.2771.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey to RBFHSS: (1) the right to grant permission to republish or reprint the stated material, in whole or in part, without a fee; (2) the right to print republish copies for free distribution or sale; and (3) the right to republish the stated material in any format (electronic or printed). In addition, the undersigned affirms that the article described above has not previously been published, in whole or part, is not subject to copyright or other rights except by the author(s), and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere, except as communicated in writing to RHFHSS with this document.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-ND) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Serlf-archiving policy
This journal permits and encourages authors to post and archive the final pdf of the articles submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit its publication in this journal.